<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joobili on Travolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/</link>
	<description>Timely Travel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joobili.com/?p=229#comment-28</guid>
		<description>@Cathy- We&#039;ve also been dissappointed in the conversion rate of offline pr. You miss out on all the impulse click throughs and it turns out that is a substantial number. What&#039;s been your best method of driving traffic to your site?

@Sam- I hate to say it but I think you&#039;re right. If it&#039;s not mobile, twitter or a big name it&#039;s boring. That still doesn&#039;t answer my question of &#039;is it fair&#039;? I know, I know...who cares if it&#039;s fair it&#039;s reality. Still, I&#039;m curious to hear what people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cathy- We&#8217;ve also been dissappointed in the conversion rate of offline pr. You miss out on all the impulse click throughs and it turns out that is a substantial number. What&#8217;s been your best method of driving traffic to your site?</p>
<p>@Sam- I hate to say it but I think you&#8217;re right. If it&#8217;s not mobile, twitter or a big name it&#8217;s boring. That still doesn&#8217;t answer my question of &#8216;is it fair&#8217;? I know, I know&#8230;who cares if it&#8217;s fair it&#8217;s reality. Still, I&#8217;m curious to hear what people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joobili.com/?p=229#comment-158</guid>
		<description>@Cathy- We&#039;ve also been dissappointed in the conversion rate of offline pr. You miss out on all the impulse click throughs and it turns out that is a substantial number. What&#039;s been your best method of driving traffic to your site?

@Sam- I hate to say it but I think you&#039;re right. If it&#039;s not mobile, twitter or a big name it&#039;s boring. That still doesn&#039;t answer my question of &#039;is it fair&#039;? I know, I know...who cares if it&#039;s fair it&#039;s reality. Still, I&#039;m curious to hear what people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cathy- We&#8217;ve also been dissappointed in the conversion rate of offline pr. You miss out on all the impulse click throughs and it turns out that is a substantial number. What&#8217;s been your best method of driving traffic to your site?</p>
<p>@Sam- I hate to say it but I think you&#8217;re right. If it&#8217;s not mobile, twitter or a big name it&#8217;s boring. That still doesn&#8217;t answer my question of &#8216;is it fair&#8217;? I know, I know&#8230;who cares if it&#8217;s fair it&#8217;s reality. Still, I&#8217;m curious to hear what people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Daams</title>
		<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Daams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joobili.com/?p=229#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Journalists are generally suckers for previous merits. It&#039;s really tough for startups without big/famous backers to get any kind of press at all these days, unless you have some angle that&#039;s hot. Currently that would be mobile or twitter; the rest isn&#039;t interesting, no matter how well thought out your actual business model is (that&#039;s boring!) :) Don&#039;t get me wrong, I don&#039;t mean Kevin specifically as he&#039;s a lot better than most at listening at pitches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalists are generally suckers for previous merits. It&#8217;s really tough for startups without big/famous backers to get any kind of press at all these days, unless you have some angle that&#8217;s hot. Currently that would be mobile or twitter; the rest isn&#8217;t interesting, no matter how well thought out your actual business model is (that&#8217;s boring!) <img src='http://blog.joobili.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I don&#8217;t mean Kevin specifically as he&#8217;s a lot better than most at listening at pitches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Daams</title>
		<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Daams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joobili.com/?p=229#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Journalists are generally suckers for previous merits. It&#039;s really tough for startups without big/famous backers to get any kind of press at all these days, unless you have some angle that&#039;s hot. Currently that would be mobile or twitter; the rest isn&#039;t interesting, no matter how well thought out your actual business model is (that&#039;s boring!) :) Don&#039;t get me wrong, I don&#039;t mean Kevin specifically as he&#039;s a lot better than most at listening at pitches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalists are generally suckers for previous merits. It&#8217;s really tough for startups without big/famous backers to get any kind of press at all these days, unless you have some angle that&#8217;s hot. Currently that would be mobile or twitter; the rest isn&#8217;t interesting, no matter how well thought out your actual business model is (that&#8217;s boring!) <img src='http://blog.joobili.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I don&#8217;t mean Kevin specifically as he&#8217;s a lot better than most at listening at pitches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Bartrop</title>
		<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Bartrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joobili.com/?p=229#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Good question Jared. We&#039;ve also found it tough to get coverage. Its frustrating but it seems innovation is not enough of a story, getting financial backing, especially from a &#039;name&#039; will certainly grab more attention. But ultimately the big players don&#039;t want to direct their readers to these great sites - they all have their own sites to plug.

We got a few mentions in nationals when we launched last year (notably The Times Website of the Week spot) but to be honest did not notice huge spikes in traffic as a result. I think the thing is if you are online, you need to find your audience online. Far easier for a potential visitor to click through than make a note of the site name and remember to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Jared. We&#8217;ve also found it tough to get coverage. Its frustrating but it seems innovation is not enough of a story, getting financial backing, especially from a &#8216;name&#8217; will certainly grab more attention. But ultimately the big players don&#8217;t want to direct their readers to these great sites &#8211; they all have their own sites to plug.</p>
<p>We got a few mentions in nationals when we launched last year (notably The Times Website of the Week spot) but to be honest did not notice huge spikes in traffic as a result. I think the thing is if you are online, you need to find your audience online. Far easier for a potential visitor to click through than make a note of the site name and remember to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Bartrop</title>
		<link>http://blog.joobili.com/2009/03/10/joobili-on-travolution/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Bartrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joobili.com/?p=229#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Good question Jared. We&#039;ve also found it tough to get coverage. Its frustrating but it seems innovation is not enough of a story, getting financial backing, especially from a &#039;name&#039; will certainly grab more attention. But ultimately the big players don&#039;t want to direct their readers to these great sites - they all have their own sites to plug.

We got a few mentions in nationals when we launched last year (notably The Times Website of the Week spot) but to be honest did not notice huge spikes in traffic as a result. I think the thing is if you are online, you need to find your audience online. Far easier for a potential visitor to click through than make a note of the site name and remember to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Jared. We&#8217;ve also found it tough to get coverage. Its frustrating but it seems innovation is not enough of a story, getting financial backing, especially from a &#8216;name&#8217; will certainly grab more attention. But ultimately the big players don&#8217;t want to direct their readers to these great sites &#8211; they all have their own sites to plug.</p>
<p>We got a few mentions in nationals when we launched last year (notably The Times Website of the Week spot) but to be honest did not notice huge spikes in traffic as a result. I think the thing is if you are online, you need to find your audience online. Far easier for a potential visitor to click through than make a note of the site name and remember to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

